Thanks for all the great answers so far! By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. I'd really like to meet someone that acquired good understanding of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, degenerate perturbation theory, or, hell, even the friggin' uncertainty principle by reading Griffiths. Looking at Amazon and other websites has been fairly unhelpful, since there aren't too many reviews and many of them are from opposite ends of the spectrum. Best physics textbooks? EDIT: I'm going to be starting all my upper division courses soon. On special relativity, iDante recommends Taylor & Wheeler's Spacetime Physics over Harris' Modern Physics, French's Special Relativity, and others. Posts should be pertinent, meme-free, and generate a discussion about physics. Here is something that I wish everyone agreed about: Like your taste in movies and food, you have a taste for textbooks. Upvote for Taylor, that is an excellent textbook. Contributor: Gea-Banacloche Publisher: University of Arkansas This is a “minimalist” textbook for a first semester of university, calculus-based physics, covering … This is both to answer the many people asking what my background was or being uncertain as to where I am in my degree as well as to direct people as to the kind of textbooks I'm most interested in hearing about. I dislike Griffiths. This is the best history of modern particle physics ever written. This textbook is … Find that one book you connect with. The aim of /r/Physics is to build a subreddit frequented by physicists, scientists, and those with a passion for physics. Modern Classical Physics. The topic of textbooks is one that I've heard and had lots of conversations about. University Physics I: Classical Mechanics. For what subject? Point of this post being I wanted opinions so that I knew in general where to look. Must read for physicists. ), McQuarrie (eh) and Terrell Hill's book. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. There are not enough examples, and he's more focused on having you figure things out than teaching you the subject or providing a reference manual. Basic Physics: A Self-Teaching Guide, 3rd Edition (Wiley Self-Teaching Guides) I don't know if anything was changed in the last edition, but when I took QM, I found his treatment to be superficial. Electromagnetics, volume 2 by Steven W. Ellingson is a 216-page peer-reviewed open textbook designed especially for electrical engineering students in the third year of a bachelor of science degree program. My advice - no matter what the text book for the course is, you can study everything from a book that "fits" your own preferences. In my non-US university, we use one of the big general physics books for the first Mechanics and EM courses, and then use Griffiths for the second undergraduate EM course (after we've learned PDEs). Any good quantum mechanics textbook. I've also looked into Chandler (horrible! Physics are suggested by subject experts and toppers of the year. Ugh, I absolutely detest Kittel and Kroemer. Sure, you'll know how to solve the particle in a box problem, but turning the crank on a simple ODE with trivial boundary conditions doesn't get you far in the way of understanding quantum mechanics. Unfortunately I haven't found anything that really suits me besides a few specialty books, like Krane. I'm at about a junior level in physics, but really I was just wondering what some of the best literature was out there. What level? Modern Classical Physics (appx. What is your background? It is intended as the primary textbook for the second semester of a two-semester undergraduate engineering electromagnetics sequence. His EM book is untouchable. Not really on board with Griffiths for QM. Modern Physics … 1 atom book, 1 molecular book, 1 special relativity book, 1 solid state book, 1 nuclear and particle physics book … ), Statistical mechanics: Kardar (both his Particles book and his Fields book), and Sethna for interesting problems, Quantum field theory: Peskin and Schroeder, and Zee for some conceptual insights. For perspective, I am currently a grad student in theoretical particle physics. The Feynman lectures, which everybody raves about on reddit, are such. Papers from physics journals (free or otherwise) are encouraged. This book describes how modern physics based on relativity theory and quantum mechanics was born in the beginning of the 20th century from a collapse of classical physics. I'd still recommend getting Kardar even if you get Goldenfeld. Cookies help us deliver our Services. Best physics textbooks? EDIT: I also really liked Boas "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences". Modern Physics Bring Modern Physics to Life with a Realistic Software Simulation! There's a problem loading this menu right now. If I were to ever teach quantum, I'd use Shankar and recommend Griffiths as light reading in case someone finds it useful. The topic of textbooks is one that I've heard and had lots of conversations about. University Physics with Modern Physics (14th Edition) by Hugh D. Young & Roger A. Freedman is one of the best physics books for beginners. On abstract algebra , Bundle_Gerbe recommends Dummit & Foote's Abstract Algebra over Lang's Algebra and others. I agree. Not every one of these books can, but then again, you're expected to be able to teach yourself from tough books at the grad level. The following are textbooks that I think are a great accompaniment to a lecture, as well as something I'd be able to teach myself out of (though I always learn best with both lecture and textbook): Abstract algebra, finite group theory: Artin, General relativity: Hartle for the most basic (but well-acclaimed) introduction, Carroll for one slight step up, (For this section, I've bolded the ones that can actually be used as some form of teacher replacement. After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. Kittel&Kroemer can seem dense and difficult to understand at first, but once you work through problems and spend time on each chapter, it will become apparent how efficient the book is. That said, I've never found a stat mech book that really appeals to me. For statmech, a good alternative to Kardar for Fields is Lectures On Phase Transitions And The Renormalization Group by Goldenfeld. Lectures On Phase Transitions And The Renormalization Group by Goldenfeld. $ 67) is written by a pair of legends in … Hill does the best out of each, but I'm convinced that everyone is doing something wrong in terms of teaching stat mech. My two cents: his E&M rocks, his QM blows. On the other hand, there are numerous examples of books that over the years I found helpful, while many of my peers thought they were an absolute waste of time. Prime members enjoy FREE Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio series, and Kindle books. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. The problem with QM is that you can't learn it by being spoon-fed trivial examples, the way Griffiths does it. Top subscription boxes – right to your door, © 1996-2020, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. The topic of textbooks is one that I've heard and had lots of conversations about. Because it focuses on fundamental principles of physics and the ways how to apply them. I am curious since no textbooks at a lower level than that have been mentioned in the thread. Schaum's Outline of Modern Physics (ISBN-10: 0070248303 ) Best is of course to get introductory books in all topics by themeself. Looking at Amazon and other websites has been fairly unhelpful, since there aren't too many reviews and many of them are from opposite ends of the spectrum.