! Fallout New Vegas is a great game and deal. Should play Fallout New York. However, most people are heavily entranced by graphics these days. Fallout 3 is much easier and Fallout New Vegas added some features that will be more obviously missing if you go from New Vegas to FO3. A random mailman tries to deliver a platinum chip to a computer factory but gets killed by a character voiced by Jennifer Aniston, there are Irish ghouls, which are really pale. Fallout 3 is a brilliant game, it has it's disadvantages over its successors but in its own right it has a certain uniqueness and plenty of charm. The storylines barely relate to one another and even some basic aspects of them, like how certain factions act, differ pretty significantly. In my opinion, the storyline and gameplay of fallout 1 and 2 is far superior to Fallout 3 and New Vegas. Some of the changes they make to New Vegas make it somewhat annoying. While I have yet to buy New Vegas, and I most definitely plan to, I have a friend that recently finished it on the 360 and thought it was very good. I would play Fallout 3. Fallout 2 is somewhat connected to fallout 1. Considering this, if you are in need of a graphically superior game I'd say go Fallout 3. I have been playing the game for about three weeks and like the last one, it has its glitches like the game freezing and characters that get stuck in the walls but unlike the previous version, I did not have to fork out $60 for it! Play it. Are both good to play through or is Fallout 3 the better one out of the two games? If you can't finish Fallout 3, then I suggest you not play New Vegas. Repairing weapons is a pain and the ammo bench I never really figured out. New Cambridge Rangers, the Mongolians, the sisterhood of steel, the exclave remamnents, and the Italians led by a man named Caesar. Short answer: depends and/or doesn’t matter which as all of them are good. They are a bit different in terms of story structure, game world and characters, but it still is the same type of Fallout experience. I have a question about both Fallout 3 and Fallout New Vegas. There are a few aspects I would say it actually did things better than new Vegas and 4. Moreover, my friend has also beaten Fallout 3 and the DLC, so he should be a good judge of New Vegas' new features and playability, and mentioned that his play … It has a better story and is way less glitchy. Fallout 4 isn’t that bad… It works as a rather nice modern light RPG with a postapocalyptic setting, just kinda fails as a Fallout game.